Back in August Rand Fishkin from SEOmoz posted an interesting article called “A Theory About Google: Authenticity and Passion as Ranking Signals”. The article reviews a certain occurrence that many of us in the SEO field have been noticing.
“Over the past 6-9 months, I've been getting the sense that there's something new in Google's algorithm - a metric or set of metrics that looks for some form of authenticity in a site and passion in the content created on a page.”
Rand speaks about passion factors playing a role in this change but doesn't theorize how Google may using the information in rankings.
The overall concept makes complete sense. Sometimes powerhouse websites produce low quality content just as low powered personal blogs can sometimes produce extraordinarily useful information. Google has to account for this in order to ensure the best results are shown when someone searches.
Here are two ways Google may be accomplishing this goal.
In Rand’s example he searched for the phrase “Seattle Waterfront Walk” and a fairly unknown personal blog pops up in the second spot. Why? Well this is what I like to call the Starbucks effect.
Websites like Yelp, TripAdvisor, and Google/Yahoo local are like the Starbucks of the internet. Often when people conduct local searches they do a good job of taking over all available landscape. This is ok when looking for a store on the fly but it can become stifling when simply searching for local information.
Blogs are almost like the “mom and pop” stores of the internet. Google can recognize that “Seattle Waterfront Walk” is a search most likely looking for location specific information. So where’s the best place to find it? Google picked out a personal blog written by a photographer residing in Seattle instead of much more authoritative national “Starbucks-like” websites.

In the above picture you can see how the blog links directly to his Blogger profile. Since Blogger is owned by Google it's an easy way for them to get a general idea of a blog's location.
Let's look at a hypothetical scenerio of how viral content signals may look very different depending on the website size.
Pretend the average Mashable article receives 1,500 social shares and 50 backlinks (again, hypothetical statistics).
Now pretend there's a personal blog covering the same industry averaging 90 social shares and 4 backlinks per post (equal quality to Mashable’s).
One day they happen to publish an article simultaneously that covers identical topics. After two days the Mashable article receives 700 social shares and 40 links. The personal blog post receives 300 social shares and 15 links. The Mashable article has received over twice as many shares and links as the other post; but will it rank higher?
In this scenario, when you compare the article to Mashable’s entire website it becomes apparent it’s only half as popular as their average article. Conversely, the personal blog article was over three times more popular than the average article on their site.
In order to show the best possible results Google must continually determine which pages contains better content and then rank them accordingly. Google’s algorithm runs in a very logical manner. It would be very easy to make the argument that in certain circumstances a very popular article on a small site should outrank a subpar article on a larger well known site. This is also a very scalable metric to incorporate (always important to Google) and could be accomplished by including a few site wide standard deviation measurements into their algorithm.
As for what this all means: well, I think Rand said it best "if writing passionate, authentic content on more personal, unique sites can earn more mojo in search, I'd say that's a win for everyone." Cheers to Google for finding new ways to unearth these great pieces of content hidding throughout the internet.
“Why should I pay for Google ads if I already rank in the organic results? Won’t the user just click on my organic link instead?”
We get this question all the time from clients. In PPC, it can be really difficult to separate personal search habits from how everyone else searches, which can often be wildly different. Our performance data has always shown that more leads can be picked up by utilizing both paid advertisements as well as organic rankings on Google, but this was difficult to translate to clients, as our data set was never quite large enough to prove significant. Lucky for us, Google is very good at crunching large datasets, and they did just that to answer this exact question.
Recently, Google conducted a study titled "Search Ads Pause Study," in which it looked at over 400 accounts across four countries in which it looked to use statistical models to answer the simple question: Are ads necessary when organic presence is high? Because of our previous experience we already knew the answer yes, but we had no idea it was to the extent that Google found.
Here is a fun video Google put together explaining the study and its results.
On average, 89% of paid traffic to an advertiser’s site is lost and not recovered by organic clicks.
Wait a minute… 89%? That’s HUGE!
The issue is we all suffer from a personal bias in which we believe everyone searches the way we do. We may have never clicked a Google ad in our lives, but the $92+ Billion Google made last year would argue that plenty of people click on those ads. This is just another reminder of the importance of data and the need to base decisions not on our own personal beliefs, but on the hard data.
Silverback Strategies was recently invited to speak to students of Georgetown University’s McDonough School of Business. We sat down with one particular class to take a look at trends in search marketing, its history and current best practices in organic and paid search.
Course students included diverse marketing and business majors, many of whom are already working in the field. Some were new to SEM, others were very technically sophisticated.
“Any time we speak, the most important message we can convey is how dynamic SEM is. You can’t set-it-and-forget-it,” said Nelson. “Major shifts like Google’s Panda update and continual algorithm changes are continually shaking things up in this business. Anyone who is going into SEM needs to understand that environment to be successful.”
Panda is the name of Google’s latest major algorithm update that radically changed how Google ranks websites. The new algorithm puts far more emphasis on content quality and other characteristics that align with actual user priorities.
“Google changes their algorithm nearly 500 times each year, so we must continually adjust our clients’ search strategies to maintain their rankings,” adds Nelson. “There are literally hundreds of content, linking, and architectural factors that go into the ranking formula – and I think that came as a surprise to some of these students.”
Not surprisingly, the Georgetown students were particularly intrigued at how social sites such as Facebook and Twitter, and emerging social media such as Google+ are becoming increasingly influential to search results.
“Our goal was to leave these students with a basic understanding of today’s search landscape and to start a smart conversation that could hopefully bring some real value to their careers as future marketers,” says Welsh.
"Silverback Strategies has been a great resource for our dealership hitting it’s sales goals on a consistent basis. The online campaigns they’ve built for our organization has increased our Internet leads by 40%."
- Jeff Salton, Alexandria Toyota